Destined For Deadlock Or Worse


In the next couple of months a committee of 12 people will get together in a room in our nation’s Capitol, put pen to paper, and look to cut our Federal budget. Let me put this as bluntly as I can: this “Super” Congressional Committee is a farce and nothing but a tax increase trap.

In my opinion, this “Super Committee” is un-Constitutional at best and the mere presence of it is a testament to our elected officials inability to lead. It is also designed not to solve the problem. If this group does not come to an agreement to cut, then an automatic minimum of $1.2 trillion of cuts occur which will be split equally between defense spending and “all other spending”. Don’t get me wrong. There is plenty of fat in our defense budget and I think nothing should be held immune to cuts but assigning half of the spending “blame” to defense spending? Anyone who pays attention know that the real culprit of our long term malaise is underfunded and over-promised entitlement spending. 

To understand why the chances this committee will NOT do anything substantial let’s handicap its members:

Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash): Chairperson of the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee and is the Senate Democrats leading fundraiser. Her home state of Washington is where Boeing, a defense contractor, is located. In my opinion she is there for one reason: to ensure that any deal will protect incumbent Senate Democrats to ensure the majority. (National Taxpayers Union Rank: F)

Senator Max Baucus (D-Mont): Chairperson of the Senate Finance Committee. He helped to craft the new health care boondoggle. He was vehemently opposed to any Social Security privatization proposed under President Bush. He voted against the Bowles/Simpson plan because it cut Medicare. (NTU Rank: F)

Senator John Kerry (D-Mass): Chairperson of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Viewed as a defense cutter. (NTU Rank: F)

Senator Patrick Toomey (R-Pa): Voted against the raising of the debt ceiling. Former President of the Club for Growth. Against raising taxes. (NTU Rank: NR)

Senator John Kyle (R-Az): A staunch advocate for the military. Opposes tax increases. (NTU Rank: A)

Senator Rob Portman (R-Oh): Former Office of Management and Budget director under President Bush. Considered a “moderate” Republican. (NTU Rank: NR)

Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Tex): Chairperson of the Republican Conference. He was on President Obama’s debt commission and voted no on the measure. Against tax increases. (NTU Rank: A)

Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich): Chairperson of the House Ways and Means Committee (think IRS). He was on President Obama’s debt commission. Against tax increases. (NTU Rank: B+)

Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich): Chairperson of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Viewed by most as a moderate Republican. During the Bush administration argued for decreasing tax cuts. (NTU Rank: B)

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md): Ranking member on the House Budget Committee. Former head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. (NTU Rank: F)

Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-Ca): Vice Chairman of the House Democratic Caucus. Voted against the debt deal and was quoted as saying “…it does not ask for shared sacrifice”. (NTU Rank: F)

Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC): Third ranking House Democrat. He was recently quoted as saying he would use his seat to social engineer and “close the wealth gap”. (NTU Rank: F)

Looking at this committee as a whole the big picture starts to form. It will all come down to the prospect of raising taxes. One of the basic tenets of Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War” is that “every battle is won before it is ever fought”. It seems to me that battle lines have already been drawn and on one side will be potential 6 tax raisers and on the other side 6…err make that 4 “friends of the tax payer”. The big unknown here is the presence of 2 “moderate” Republicans who have the potential to say ”yes” to a tax increase and possibly put Congress in the unenviable position of voting on it which will have only two possible outcomes:

1) Both chambers vote “yes” and will be blamed for raising taxes on people in a crushing recession putting good, small government advocates at re-election risk, or

2) At least one chamber votes “no” and leftists will hit the airwaves blaming them for stalling the deficit reduction process in an election year putting good, small government advocates at re-election risk.

The only way this committee finds a majority and forwards a recommendation it will be with a tax increase and then, as usual, “we the people” lose. If they don’t find a majority the automatic cuts imposed will not solve the problem and, as usual, “we the people” lose. With an even number of committee members the outcome of this battle is already predetermined. This committee was designed for, and is destined for deadlock…or worse.

Blaise Ingoglia, Founder

Government Gone Wild

National Taxpayer Union Rankings HERE

33 responses to “Destined For Deadlock Or Worse”

  • deven says
  • Joe Wilson says
  • Davidlee says
  • Shirley Walton says
  • Len LeBlanc says
  • Dick Elling says
  • Jimbo says
  • Thomas Eberlin says
  • Lucy Overstreet says
  • Vinny Ciro says
  • Gary Qualls says
    • Vinny Ciro says
  • Bestcom says
  • Diane says
  • ZBIGNUE says
  • GrumpyOne says
    • Liz says
  • Donna Steward says
  • Nancy Rice says
  • Judge Knot says
  • Rich Walton says
  • Charlotte Gotzeff says
  • John Nelson says
    • Rick Shafer says
  • SubVet says
  • James Bigham says
  • DON GOODMAN says
  • Abe Hall says
  • Don Parker says
    • Wanda says

Leave a reply